From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Leo Subject: Re: counter-intuitive key bindings Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2007 17:57:39 +0100 Message-ID: References: <87ejisycqy.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1ILMC8-0006hc-4D for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Aug 2007 12:58:08 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1ILMC7-0006hO-LQ for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Aug 2007 12:58:07 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ILMC7-0006hL-Ic for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Aug 2007 12:58:07 -0400 Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2] helo=ciao.gmane.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1ILMC7-0002f0-1V for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Aug 2007 12:58:07 -0400 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1ILMBt-0005E3-Pi for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Aug 2007 18:57:53 +0200 Received: from accountslaptop.gradunion.cam.ac.uk ([193.60.92.141]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 15 Aug 2007 18:57:53 +0200 Received: from sdl.web by accountslaptop.gradunion.cam.ac.uk with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 15 Aug 2007 18:57:53 +0200 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org On 2007-08-09 06:05 +0100, Carsten Dominik wrote: >> In this case, I feel there should a consistent definition of key >> bindings. One excellent example is vc, it is just so easy to remember. > > What do you mean with "consistent definition of key bindings". > >> I have been an regular user of org, and I have already forgotten that >> S-up/down does priority change after one month's break. > > I have been trying very hard to make the key bindings as logical > as possible - but there is a huge amount of commands in org, > and many keys are needed. > > That said, the S-up/down for priorities does leas to a couple > of inconsistencies, in particular between agenda and org-mode buffers. > > - Carsten I know it is difficult to come up with good key bindings for so many commands that org-mode has. That's why I gave the example of vc, which has extremely excellent key bindings. I would never have to learn them a second time. I hope someone can come up with something similar for org. -- Leo (GPG Key: 9283AA3F) Gnus is one component of the Emacs operating system.