From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: John Wiegley <jwiegley@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Sync up the org in emacs master to org maint branch?
Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2017 18:46:09 -0800
Message-ID: <m2wpcwm8i6.fsf@newartisans.com>
References: <CAFyQvY16F7Vn0Wa=qV1g+HWWLV0cT7FaixLN8w7sJEAWJz9P3Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<m2o9yp4qzn.fsf@newartisans.com> <87k29d7zvw.fsf@engster.org>
	<m27f5cedxw.fsf@newartisans.com> <87fuk08i01.fsf@engster.org>
	<m27f5cxlk9.fsf@RFC1918.na.baesystems.com>
	<87d1f36xnc.fsf@engster.org> <m2a8a5uwq2.fsf@newartisans.com>
	<87a8a4ees0.fsf@engster.org> <m28tpoca3k.fsf@newartisans.com>
	<87poiz2raf.fsf@engster.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54935)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <jwiegley@gmail.com>) id 1cckBF-0002eE-CI
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Feb 2017 21:46:26 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <jwiegley@gmail.com>) id 1cckBE-0004PQ-3L
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Feb 2017 21:46:25 -0500
In-Reply-To: <87poiz2raf.fsf@engster.org> (David Engster's message of "Fri, 03
	Feb 2017 17:05:44 +0100")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Emacs-orgmode"
	<emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: David Engster <deng@randomsample.de>
Cc: Bastien Guerry <bzg@gnu.org>, Emacs developers <emacs-devel@gnu.org>, Phillip Lord <phillip.lord@russet.org.uk>, emacs-org list <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>, Kaushal Modi <kaushal.modi@gmail.com>

>>>>> "DE" == David Engster <deng@randomsample.de> writes:

DE> I find this whole core vs package argument strange. If you ship Emacs with
DE> Org, Gnus and CEDET, they are part of Emacs, so it's in the interest of
DE> all Emacs developers that they work well, whether they use them or not.
DE> The users won't care if they originate from a separate repo and are
DE> considered a "package". So if Paul is determined to fix all occurences of
DE> "compatilibity" in the doc-strings, why would he only do that for core?

If pulling Emacs.git also pulls ELPA.git (as it should, since it's within our
purview as well), then global search&replace should still affect all the
files.

I hear your other points, so I'm curious now as to what more people think
about this who work on Emacs core: Do you want more modularity with regard
ELPA, or does the monolithic model work better for you?

-- 
John Wiegley                  GPG fingerprint = 4710 CF98 AF9B 327B B80F
http://newartisans.com                          60E1 46C4 BD1A 7AC1 4BA2