From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Alan Schmitt <alan.schmitt@polytechnique.org>
Subject: Re: [patch] ox-koma-letter.el: clean-up/semantic bug [4/4]
Date: Tue, 21 May 2013 13:32:25 +0200
Message-ID: <m2vc6csh4m.fsf@polytechnique.org>
References: <87wqqusder.fsf@pank.eu> <87ehd2sc6t.fsf@pank.eu>
	<m2ehd1tziq.fsf@polytechnique.org> <87wqqsd7p8.fsf@pank.eu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:55451)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <alan.schmitt@polytechnique.org>) id 1Ueknn-0005aa-Ml
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 21 May 2013 07:32:25 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <alan.schmitt@polytechnique.org>) id 1Ueknm-0000nJ-98
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 21 May 2013 07:32:23 -0400
Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr ([192.134.164.83]:1152)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <alan.schmitt@polytechnique.org>) id 1Ueknm-0000mv-3z
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 21 May 2013 07:32:22 -0400
In-reply-to: <87wqqsd7p8.fsf@pank.eu>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Rasmus <rasmus@gmx.us>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Rasmus writes:

> Alan Schmitt <alan.schmitt@polytechnique.org> writes:
>
>>> It seems there are some semantic bugs in ox-koma-letter.el in that new
>>> variables are introduces for SENDER (as opposed to AUTHOR) and a
>>> separate email variable as well.  This seems like a semantic bug IMO.
>>> This patch fixes these issues if they in fact are issues.
>>
>> Can we still use an lco file to set these after this change?
>
> (I'll also post this on the list).
>
> You can't set
>   
>   #+SENDER: 
>
> Which seems to be how it was set up before.  You can use 
>
>   #+AUTHOR
>
> So if you decide to convert your document from something you'd export
> with the normal LaTeX exporter it would be smoother this way.  Author
> now works the same way that it does in the LaTeX exporter (come to
> think of it, we probably shouldn't need to mention anything as it
> build on top of the LaTeX exporter anyway). 
>
> Thus, unless you disable export of author it wouldn't work with a LCO
> file.  But then we could make export of author conditional on
> :with-author as in ox-latex.el and you could use LCO files.
>
> The gain is that in the (for me) 99.9% of the cases where I want to
> send a letter in my own name the exporter just figures it out without
> be having to specify anything (like in the normal exporter).

OK, sounds good, I've applied it.

Thanks,

Alan