From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Dave Abrahams <dave@boostpro.com>
Subject: Re: Hide drawers in indirect buffers?
Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2011 11:22:05 -0400
Message-ID: <m2ty7okciq.fsf@boostpro.com>
References: <m2y5x4tym9.fsf@boostpro.com>
	<m28vp3b2zc.fsf@pluto.luannocracy.com>
	<4A75B771-BB5D-4245-BC36-94CF1E153C17@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:41941)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <dave@boostpro.com>) id 1RB6ow-0005Jt-2L
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Oct 2011 11:22:15 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <dave@boostpro.com>) id 1RB6ou-0000W3-SR
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Oct 2011 11:22:13 -0400
Received: from mail-vx0-f169.google.com ([209.85.220.169]:56711)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <dave@boostpro.com>) id 1RB6ou-0000Vz-Mx
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Oct 2011 11:22:12 -0400
Received: by vcbfo14 with SMTP id fo14so604689vcb.0
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Tue, 04 Oct 2011 08:22:11 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <4A75B771-BB5D-4245-BC36-94CF1E153C17@gmail.com> (Carsten
	Dominik's message of "Tue, 4 Oct 2011 10:00:56 +0200")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: </archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Carsten Dominik <carsten.dominik@gmail.com>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org


on Tue Oct 04 2011, Carsten Dominik <carsten.dominik-AT-gmail.com> wrote:

> On Oct 2, 2011, at 9:36 PM, Dave Abrahams wrote:
>
>> 
>> on Sat Oct 01 2011, Dave Abrahams <dave-AT-boostpro.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> When I initially request an indirect buffer for an item (especially from
>>> the agenda) it shows up with all its drawers open.  I'd prefer it if
>>> they were closed by default.  Is there a way to do that?
>> 
>> To follow up my own post...
>> 
>> This is actually very surprising, because the entry shows up in a state
>> that can't be reached by tabbing on its headline, with all the drawers
>> open.  If you run (org-show-entry) in the indirect buffer it goes into a
>> less-noisy configuration.
>
> This is indeed a bug, fixed now.

Thanks.  So, just for my education, can you explain why running
`org-cycle-hook 'all' is superior to just `org-show-entry' (which was my
workaround)?

-- 
Dave Abrahams
BoostPro Computing
http://www.boostpro.com