From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rainer M Krug Subject: Re: Specifying ATTR_LATEX document wide? Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2015 12:28:03 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87r3purzjl.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87k2vdgx8w.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87eglcbv7g.fsf@selenimh.access.network> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53926) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Z4o6L-0007ht-2u for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Jun 2015 06:28:17 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Z4o6H-0001Ih-9a for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Jun 2015 06:28:16 -0400 Received: from mail-wg0-f47.google.com ([74.125.82.47]:34667) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Z4o6G-0001H3-TO for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Jun 2015 06:28:13 -0400 Received: by wgv5 with SMTP id 5so8865270wgv.1 for ; Tue, 16 Jun 2015 03:28:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from Rainers-MacBook-Pro.local (arn78-1-88-186-171-7.fbx.proxad.net. [88.186.171.7]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id m4sm953326wjb.37.2015.06.16.03.28.09 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 16 Jun 2015 03:28:10 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87eglcbv7g.fsf@selenimh.access.network> (Nicolas Goaziou's message of "Mon, 15 Jun 2015 21:57:55 +0200") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Nicolas Goaziou writes: > Rainer M Krug writes: > >> Thanks for the clarification. Is there a technical or security reason >> for this? because especially for export, file local variables would make >> sense to avoid the #+BIND keywords? > > ISTR there is a technical reason for this. Under some circumstances, > local variables are not activated during export. I cannot remember which > ones, unfortunately. > Thanks for the info. > Also, unlike to local variables, BIND keywords can be set through > SETUPFILE keywords. Oh the SETUPFILE - have never thought about that one. Thanks, Rainer > > > Regards, =2D-=20 Rainer M. Krug, PhD (Conservation Ecology, SUN), MSc (Conservation Biology,= UCT), Dipl. Phys. (Germany) Centre of Excellence for Invasion Biology Stellenbosch University South Africa Tel : +33 - (0)9 53 10 27 44 Cell: +33 - (0)6 85 62 59 98 Fax : +33 - (0)9 58 10 27 44 Fax (D): +49 - (0)3 21 21 25 22 44 email: Rainer@krugs.de Skype: RMkrug PGP: 0x0F52F982 --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJVf/o4AAoJENvXNx4PUvmCD1sIANBWZjjM2VT1OUKWIwn2wDD9 LHVKa2QPs22U2qExaXLCLuwfWKzKIy9rqoZryxWxe/K2fpUHfwliiVY9G5e8vWMK bz196uYQp2awt/r5H4qdUm+pR21xdD/gmtYqTrQ6Nq5Zo3r52oMKKILk4bF4ATPC v3SURLqAZBh+21dac4IJaAAqDVmo0kqm8UaClrbtc+HqW8lRjm4PQVSgQ4sfTDxt xhRGAmqYoV5vXL1Clhp0HmRYztR9QX6Czs9iNEcDL1UfDMJf9aQxkUwk0HiGs8Yu KImx/YBWIf4oMCQ03CIVeFBmrUggPpcy3b0yI0ZU00Mun6qYZ8hsT7rsNZFKMo4= =Uu3+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--