On 19/06/2024, Ihor Radchenko wrote:

> Al Haji-Ali <abdo.haji.ali@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> On 18/06/2024, Ihor Radchenko wrote:
>>> Hmm. Thanks, but the patch does not apply on my side.
>>> May you instead create a patch as a separate file, add the commit
>>> message, and attach that patch file in the email reply?
>>
>> See attached.
>
> Thanks. Although this is a different kind of patch. And it is doing too
> much - we do not want to expand all the names via `file-truename'
> because you may have a situation like
>
> /path/to/file1.org
> /path/to/symlinks/name-is-completely-different.org
>
> Then, using `file-truename' may be confusing for people who expect the
> symlink name to be displayed.

I am not sure what would be the correct approach. Perhaps the true-name expansion should be conditioned on the value of `find-file-visit-truename`.

> I am thus attaching an alternative patch.
> May you please test if it fixes the problem on your side?
I think it's missing calling `file-truename` call on `filename`, see attached patch.

Best regards,
-- Al