From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Christian Moe <mail@christianmoe.com>
Subject: Re: disable tangling for an entire section?
Date: Thu, 09 May 2013 08:54:03 +0200
Message-ID: <m2sj1wzluc.fsf@uio.no>
References: <87haifz6hb.fsf@wolfram.com> <m2ip2vdzxh.fsf@uio.no>
	<8638tzvuzy.fsf@somewhere.org> <87r4hhv22i.fsf@wolfram.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:35532)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@christianmoe.com>) id 1UaKkM-0006zG-GE
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 09 May 2013 02:54:35 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@christianmoe.com>) id 1UaKkL-0003QY-NK
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 09 May 2013 02:54:34 -0400
Received: from mail-forward5.uio.no ([2001:700:100:10::37]:39103)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@christianmoe.com>) id 1UaKhN-0002Aq-DR
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 09 May 2013 02:54:33 -0400
Received: from exim by mail-out5.uio.no with local-bsmtp (Exim 4.80.1)
	(envelope-from <mail@christianmoe.com>) id 1UaKgl-00021e-3m
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 09 May 2013 08:50:51 +0200
In-reply-to: <87r4hhv22i.fsf@wolfram.com>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Bill White <billw@wolfram.com>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org


> I was hoping that a higher-level setting would override all tangle
> settings under it, no matter what they might be.  This would make it
> possible to change an entire section's tangling without fussing with
> each code block's setting.

The status quo makes more sense, I think. It allows you to easily change
an entire section's tangling but make specific exceptions that
override the general setting.

Yours,
Christian