From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Alan Schmitt <alan.schmitt@polytechnique.org>
Subject: Re: Better way to specify the latex documentclass of an exported
 file without changing my configuration?
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2014 15:57:54 +0100
Message-ID: <m2r45pypl9.fsf@polytechnique.org>
References: <m2r45p4apk.fsf@polytechnique.org> <87ha6lumcb.fsf@gmail.com>
	<m2lhvx12wn.fsf@polytechnique.org> <87d2h9uk2b.fsf@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34772)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <alan.schmitt@polytechnique.org>) id 1WSpLJ-0005f2-76
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Mar 2014 11:02:19 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <alan.schmitt@polytechnique.org>) id 1WSpLC-0003oB-MX
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Mar 2014 11:02:13 -0400
Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr ([192.134.164.83]:29925)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <alan.schmitt@polytechnique.org>) id 1WSpLC-0003nu-G1
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Mar 2014 11:02:06 -0400
In-Reply-To: <87d2h9uk2b.fsf@gmail.com> (Nicolas Goaziou's message of "Wed, 26
	Mar 2014 15:10:52 +0100")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Nicolas Goaziou <n.goaziou@gmail.com>
Cc: emacs-orgmode <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>

Nicolas Goaziou <n.goaziou@gmail.com> writes:

> Alan Schmitt <alan.schmitt@polytechnique.org> writes:
>
>> It is in a :noexport: section already. Here is a quick test.
>>
>> Exporting
>>
>> * Test :noexport:
>>
>> #+begin_src sh
>> echo "date 1" >> ~/tmp/results
>> echo `date` >> ~/tmp/results
>> #+end_src
>>
>> #+begin_src sh :exports results :results silent
>> echo "date 2" >> ~/tmp/results
>> echo `date` >> ~/tmp/results
>> #+end_src
>>
>> yields this "~/tmp/results" file:
>>
>> date 2 Wed Mar 26 14:46:08 CET 2014
>>
>> The behavior is identical if the ":noexport:" tag is absent.
>
> Then I think you can at least remove the ":results silent" part, can't
> you?

Yes, indeed. I'm too used to putting these blocks in parts that are
actually exported. Sorry for the confusion,

Alan