From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Alan Schmitt <alan.schmitt@polytechnique.org>
Subject: Better way to specify the latex documentclass of an exported file
 without changing my configuration?
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2014 09:37:27 +0100
Message-ID: <m2r45p4apk.fsf@polytechnique.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57408)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <alan.schmitt@polytechnique.org>) id 1WSjLB-0002cu-I6
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Mar 2014 04:37:49 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <alan.schmitt@polytechnique.org>) id 1WSjL0-0003cG-UH
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Mar 2014 04:37:41 -0400
Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr ([192.134.164.83]:19919)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <alan.schmitt@polytechnique.org>) id 1WSjL0-0003bz-OA
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Mar 2014 04:37:30 -0400
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: emacs-orgmode <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>

Hello,

I'm collaborating on a paper with some colleagues, and I convinced them
to use org-mode. I'm trying to make sure the paper is as self-contained
as possible (I don't want them to have to change their emacs
configuration file). To change the documentclass name of the exported
article, I added the following block in a section that is not exported:

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
#+begin_src emacs-lisp :results silent :exports results
  (add-to-list 'org-latex-classes
               '("llncs"
                 "\\documentclass{llncs}"
                 ("\\section{%s}" . "\\section*{%s}")
                 ("\\subsection{%s}" . "\\subsection*{%s}")
                 ("\\subsubsection{%s}" . "\\subsubsection*{%s}")))
#+end_src
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

My questions are:
- is there a way to do this without an emacs-lisp block?
- is there a nicer way to make sure that an emacs-lisp block is
evaluated upon export than ":exports results :results silent"? (If
I don't put it there, the block is not evaluated.)
- is there a way to just say the name of the documentclass without all
the boilerplate code below? In other words, can I say "this is a llncs
documentclass with the same sectioning as an article"?

Thanks,

Alan