From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: John Kitchin <jkitchin@andrew.cmu.edu>
Subject: Re: something in between @@html:@@ and html blocks
Date: Fri, 04 Dec 2015 13:51:48 -0500
Message-ID: <m2mvtqf3nf.fsf@andrew.cmu.edu>
References: <m28u5agqxg.fsf@andrew.cmu.edu> <878u5a1a77.fsf@ucl.ac.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58309)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <johnrkitchin@gmail.com>) id 1a4vSU-00024f-Ri
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Dec 2015 13:51:55 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <johnrkitchin@gmail.com>) id 1a4vSQ-0005xB-P1
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Dec 2015 13:51:54 -0500
Received: from mail-qk0-x22d.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400d:c09::22d]:34207)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <johnrkitchin@gmail.com>) id 1a4vSQ-0005x4-ES
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Dec 2015 13:51:50 -0500
Received: by qkeg192 with SMTP id g192so1386538qke.1
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Fri, 04 Dec 2015 10:51:50 -0800 (PST)
In-reply-to: <878u5a1a77.fsf@ucl.ac.uk>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Eric S Fraga <e.fraga@ucl.ac.uk>
Cc: Org Mode <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>

it doesn't seem to work.

Eric S Fraga writes:

> On Friday,  4 Dec 2015 at 10:43, John Kitchin wrote:
>> I have an intermediate use case that isn't covered by html snippets or
>> blocks, and I wondered if there is a solution to it.
>>
>> What I want is to put a large tooltip on a link in html output. The text
>> for the tooltip is too large to fit on one line in a @@html:@@ snippet,
>> and if I put it in an html block it adds line breaks in the html export.
>
> Does #+HTML: work (i.e. does not introduce line breaks)?

--
Professor John Kitchin
Doherty Hall A207F
Department of Chemical Engineering
Carnegie Mellon University
Pittsburgh, PA 15213
412-268-7803
@johnkitchin
http://kitchingroup.cheme.cmu.edu