From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Miguel Morin Subject: Re: Bug: refiling gobbles a newline and absorbs the next heading [9.1.9 (release_9.1.9-65-g5e4542 @ /Applications/Emacs.app/Contents/Resources/lisp/org/)] Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2020 07:55:14 +0000 Message-ID: References: <87sgkxwk7i.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87sgkoeg7h.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87pnfqassg.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:34333) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iqY5i-0002XQ-Nj for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 12 Jan 2020 02:55:23 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iqY5h-0001Mc-Lb for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 12 Jan 2020 02:55:22 -0500 Received: from mta01.prd.rdg.aluminati.org ([94.76.243.214]:60528) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iqY5h-0001FU-EF for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 12 Jan 2020 02:55:21 -0500 In-reply-to: <87pnfqassg.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: Nicolas Goaziou Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hello, For me, with my version, it is more than a visual problem. Before refiling, the Org buffer is: ``` * heading 1 ** TODO test* heading 2 * heading 3 ``` and after refiling to `heading 3`, it is: ``` * heading 1 * heading 3 ** TODO test* heading 2 ``` Doing `S-TAB` on the document does not change it in my version. Regards, Miguel On Sat, 11 Jan 2020 at 15:58 WET, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: > Hello, > > Miguel Morin writes: > >> It's interesting that you are unable to reproduce the result. I have >> Emacs 26.3 (9.0) on macOS Mojave 10.14.6. I have reproduced it with >> `emacs -q`, so the problem is not my init file. Then I don't know what >> the culprit is and am curious and available to try things to find it. > > OK. I can reproduce it. Actually, this is a _visual_ problem, the > document is not mangled at all. If you do S-TAB on the document you will > notice that everything is at the right place. > > I'm not saying there is no bug, but it is much less bad than I thought. > I have no clue about the reason for this. > > Regards,