Nicolas Goaziou <n.goaziou@gmail.com> writes:

> Hello,
>
> Rainer M Krug <Rainer@krugs.de> writes:
>
>> I see comments as "entities which do not have any impact on the final
>> product". 
>>
>> If you regard the org file as the final product, then I
>> completely agree (I use org mainly for literate programming, and I don't
>> use any comments unless in linger code blocks, but that is not in
>> org). But if I use org for writing e.g. presentations in beamer, I might want
>> to add comments which should not be on the product (slides, article,
>> handout, ...) but which contain info in the org file.
>>
>> So we are talking different levels here.
>
> Comments do not alter the final product: they are ignored during export.
> But there are places where you cannot have comments, at all. If we look
> at the following example, similar to OP's:
>
>   Some text
>   # comment
>   Some other text
>
> comment do not split the paragraph: there were two paragraphs since the
> beginning (but still no spoon). It's only disturbing if you think
> comments can be inserted within paragraphs, which is not the case.

I think I see what you mean: if the comment would not be there, the text
would look as follow:

,----
| Some text
| 
| Some other text
`----

for the exporter. So the comment here

,----
| Some text
| # comment
| Some other text
`----

is ignored, but not the empty line resulting - is this correct? I think
the confusion is that comments in org are between comment lines and
inline comments in this regard. 

>
> This may not be perfect, but, as for me, it's good enough.
>
[snip: examples (24 lines)]
>
> Again, I think comments are acceptable, once you are aware about their
> limitations. But, I don't prevent you from opening that can of worms.

Don't worry - I am happy as it stands now and have no complains.

>
>
> Regards,

Cheers,

Rainer

-- 
Rainer M. Krug

email: RMKrug<at>gmail<dot>com