From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Christian Moe <mail@christianmoe.com>
Subject: Re: Reproducing a table
Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2017 16:38:40 +0100
Message-ID: <m2lgs7q35r.fsf@christianmoe.com>
References: <874lyxje0m.fsf@iki.fi> <m2wpbspayn.fsf@christianmoe.com>
	<87a88o17bl.fsf@iki.fi>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45874)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@christianmoe.com>) id 1cnoWU-0001x4-Uv
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 11:38:07 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@christianmoe.com>) id 1cnoWP-0001zN-Dy
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 11:38:06 -0400
Received: from mailer-211-194.hitrost.net ([91.185.211.194]:53710)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <mail@christianmoe.com>)
	id 1cnoWP-0001y5-7S
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 11:38:01 -0400
In-reply-to: <87a88o17bl.fsf@iki.fi>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Emacs-orgmode"
	<emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Jarmo Hurri <jarmo.hurri@iki.fi>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org


Jarmo Hurri writes:

> In some earlier version of Org the following
> used to work:
>
>   #+name: my-table
>   | row 1 |     1 |     2 |
>   | row 2 |     3 |     4 |
>   |-------+-------+-------|
>   |       | col 1 | col 2 |
>
>   #+call: my-table() :hlines yes
>
> That is, in the past the table name used to sort of define a function
> which could then be called to reproduce the table. But this produced
> errors in the current version, so I started to figure out ways to
> achieve the same end result.

I see! I had no idea that this was possible, but it does indeed work for
me (I'm still on version 8.3.4).

Yours,
Christian