Re: tags-todo org-agenda-custom-command weirdness

[Stig Brautaset <stig@brautaset.org>]

Kyle Meyer <kyle@kyleam.com> writes:

> Stig Brautaset writes:
>
>> For me a2 and a4 returns the same, but a1 and a3 just returns TODO h2.
>> However, I can reproduce what you're seeing by setting this:
>>
>> (setq org-agenda-todo-ignore-scheduled nil)
>
> So, provided you've configured org-agenda-todo-ignore-scheduled and
> org-agenda-tags-todo-honor-ignore-options away from their default values
> of nil, the a1-4 behavior you described is as advertised, correct?

I'm not sure. I would have expected that my configured values of
org-agenda-todo-ignore-scheduled and
org-agenda-tags-todo-honor-ignore-options would apply for all a1-4, so
whatever I configure those to the result of a1-4 should be consistent.
It looks like `tags-todo` takes my configured values into account, but
`tags` does not.

>>> b1 and b3 are empty, which I think is expected given the tags-todo type.
>>
>> Well, I disagree :-)
>>
>> This behaviour of `tags-todo` seems inconsistent to me. If `todo` can
>> find DONE items, why shouldn't `tags-todo` do the same?
>
> Perhaps it should.  The behavior has been that way for a long time, and
> the code makes it look very deliberate.  That of course is not an
> argument that it should be that way, just one basis for expectations
> (and a reason to be wary of breaking workflows).
>
> And it looks like it was actually supposed to change to your preference
> in 2017.  There was a report [0] that essentially boils down to what
> you're saying, I think.  In response, 942b6267a (org-agenda: `tags-todo'
> command type includes DONE keywords, 2017-04-18) was applied, but then
> reverted for reasons not related to the intended change in behavior [1].
>
> There was then a follow-up in 2fb129b5c (`org-scan-tags' retrieve all
> TODO keywords, not only not-done ones, 2017-08-17).  As far as I can
> tell, that was supposed to achieve the behavior you're after but didn't.
> I don't have time to dig much at the moment, but quickly stepping
> through org-scan-tags, I think the issue is that the MATCHER argument
> still filters out done states.
>
>
> [0] https://orgmode.org/list/CAF96XX0XxhPKjAxy0dQmOiy3rnT+DUok4p1y71F1AwyJaNL-MA@mail.gmail.com/
> [1] https://orgmode.org/list/874lt89fi2.fsf@free.fr/

Thank you for looking into this. I'm going to try to come up with some
tests for the behaviour, and with the help of your references see if I
can get those tests to pass.

Stig