From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Alan Schmitt <alan.schmitt@polytechnique.org>
Subject: Re: export_file_name problem with new exporter
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 20:16:28 +0100
Message-ID: <m2ip85lq43.fsf@polytechnique.org>
References: <m2sj7icg2r.fsf@top.irisa.fr>, <8738zadrpn.fsf@gmail.com>,
	<m2vcc65aes.fsf@polytechnique.org>, <87y5h2cbao.fsf@gmail.com>,
	<m2txrq59sb.fsf@polytechnique.org>, <87sj79rfr1.fsf@Rainer.invalid>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:33807)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <alan.schmitt@polytechnique.org>) id 1TjEGr-0005IM-Cv
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 14:16:43 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <alan.schmitt@polytechnique.org>) id 1TjEGl-0008Mu-2O
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 14:16:37 -0500
Received: from mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr ([192.134.164.82]:56850)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <alan.schmitt@polytechnique.org>) id 1TjEGk-0008Li-RM
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 14:16:30 -0500
In-reply-to: <87sj79rfr1.fsf@Rainer.invalid>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org


Achim Gratz writes:

> Alan Schmitt writes:
>> In other words, I see three places of interest:
>> - where the org file is
>> - where export and compilation occurs
>> - where the final result is put
>>
>> Publishing lets us deal with the last one, but I don't think there is a
>> way to distinguish between the first two.
>
> Having a separate build directory would really need to be accompanied by
> a proper build system for all but the most simple tasks.  I think you
> can very well hand off the publishing to make or something like that.
> If you are only concerned about the litter from LaTeX, use a variant of
> "texi2pdf --tidy" instead of invoking pdftex directly.

Actually, I think this is the way to go. Having a "run this command
(asynchronously) after publishing" would be perfect. I need to look into
org-publish to see if this is not already present, and if it would be
difficult to add.

Alan