From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Martyn Jago Subject: Re: [babel][patch] BUG in inline source blocks Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2012 00:34:50 +0000 Message-ID: References: <87fwf27w67.fsf@med.uni-goettingen.de> <87y5ss6aul.fsf@med.uni-goettingen.de> <87aa58aeyn.fsf@gmx.com> <87mx985g7b.fsf@med.uni-goettingen.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:45973) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RrIjX-0004Nd-Mz for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Jan 2012 19:35:04 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RrIjW-00081X-Fh for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Jan 2012 19:35:03 -0500 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:51453) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RrIjW-00080L-45 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Jan 2012 19:35:02 -0500 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RrIjT-0004H2-P8 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Jan 2012 01:34:59 +0100 Received: from 88-96-171-142.dsl.zen.co.uk ([88.96.171.142]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 29 Jan 2012 01:34:59 +0100 Received: from martyn.jago by 88-96-171-142.dsl.zen.co.uk with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 29 Jan 2012 01:34:59 +0100 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hi Eric Andreas Leha writes: [...] >> Thanks for this patch Martyn, I just pushed up your [:punct:] change. >> >>> >>> Hi Martyn, >>> >>> thanks for this patch! It does half the job for me. Now export (or >>> evaluation) already work. But in the export I get a space inserted. >>> >>> I my example, I'd expect "(here)" to appear in the export, but I get >>> "( here)". >>> >> >> This should now be fixed. >> > > Thanks, Martyn and Eric! Indeed "both" issues are fixed now. > > Regards, > Andreas Thanks. But out of interest why were the tests discarded? They are after all the proof that the code works, and the `living specification' of expected behavior. Just wondering Best, Martyn