From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: John Kitchin Subject: Re: back matter in Org documents. Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2016 18:10:45 -0400 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51623) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1baVXW-0000Zm-Vi for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Aug 2016 18:11:55 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1baVXR-0005Pv-0N for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Aug 2016 18:11:53 -0400 Received: from mail-qt0-f181.google.com ([209.85.216.181]:34384) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1baVXQ-0005Pn-SE for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Aug 2016 18:11:48 -0400 Received: by mail-qt0-f181.google.com with SMTP id u25so3366508qtb.1 for ; Thu, 18 Aug 2016 15:11:48 -0700 (PDT) In-reply-to: List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: "Allen S. Rout" Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org you could do something like [[attachfile:./2004-01-13.eml]] with this attachfile link: https://github.com/jkitchin/scimax/blob/master/scimax-org.el#L727 It works for pdf export anyway. Allen S. Rout writes: > I've got a document structure I'd like to use, and I've been thinking > about how to do it. I thought I'd float the idea, and see if anyone > has attempted something similar. > > I'm writing some prose, in which I'm referring to email messages. In > magical rainbow-pony land, my use case would look something like > > ----------- > > Text text text blah blah relevant point, see [[ref: ./2004-01-13.eml]] > blah blah more prose. > > ------------ > > A footnote/endnote signifier would be placed in the prose at the point > of the ref, and the contents of the file would be included in an > appendix section. > > I've been searching on 'appendix', and the references seem mostly to > talk about _formatting_ the section we deem an appendix, in the > appropriate style. I understand the value of this, but it's not my case. > > Should I just define a section, #+INCLUDE each email I care about, and > do an internal link? That's not awful, but it's not nearly as > high-speed and sexy. > > > - Allen S. Rout -- Professor John Kitchin Doherty Hall A207F Department of Chemical Engineering Carnegie Mellon University Pittsburgh, PA 15213 412-268-7803 @johnkitchin http://kitchingroup.cheme.cmu.edu