From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alan Schmitt Subject: Re: org-review is on melpa Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2016 08:50:09 +0200 Message-ID: References: <2016-09-08T12-52-48@devnull.Karl-Voit.at> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34063) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1biFdf-0000H7-TZ for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Sep 2016 02:50:17 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1biFdc-0000dG-P7 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Sep 2016 02:50:15 -0400 Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr ([192.134.164.83]:12305) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1biFdc-0000bM-Hr for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Sep 2016 02:50:12 -0400 In-Reply-To: <2016-09-08T12-52-48@devnull.Karl-Voit.at> (Karl Voit's message of "Thu, 8 Sep 2016 13:02:04 +0200") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: Karl Voit Cc: Karl Voit , emacs-orgmode@gnu.org --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello Karl, On 2016-09-08 13:02, Karl Voit writes: > Hallo Alan, > > * Alan Schmitt wrote: >> >> After using this for a couple of years, I=3DE2=3D80=3D99ve finally taken= the time=3D >> to >> put it on Melpa. Org-review (https://melpa.org/#/org-review) is a set of >> functions to maintain review dates for entries, so that you may generate >> agenda view of things to review. I use it every Friday during my weekly >> review to review projects and single tasks. > > I'm not familiar with org-review. I just read the description on the > page mentioned above. > > I don't particularly want to discuss this here because I think > that I don't need org-review for now. However, I do think that you > should elaborate on the fact that org-review sounds very similar to > a simple recurring todo. What are the benefits compared to recurring > todos? One could indeed use recurring todos on tasks like =E2=80=9CReview Project = A=E2=80=9D and =E2=80=9CReview Project B=E2=80=9D, but it requires creating such addit= ional tasks for each project. Org-review lets you attach another timestamp, different from the Scheduled or Deadline ones which define when the task has to be done, to schedule reviews of the task or project within the task or project. Best, Alan =2D-=20 OpenPGP Key ID : 040D0A3B4ED2E5C7 Monthly Athmospheric CO=E2=82=82, Mauna Loa Obs. 2015-08: 398.93, 2016-08: = 402.25 --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJX0luiAAoJEAQNCjtO0uXHC/8IAJEh5XUwhHG73P/124HgG1IX efNNcbjVFm9qODFTHtxuFT+C+pAU5nWOY2BGf3vGYz11qDl5RWcz8TUU1Jrvlrnf 9gAlSQxzKA/slJscJwKQjLTYSqKy4aXwOBDpy/ht2UnPUerlZc+p5O9TavqDM2qm 3EfWYTWClx3k+CGmL38If6pg18u9hwRoN2czzqeywgK/wH2Xfx5anLd7XwM6bPsD ge9GE8MvdY9bmMsvOT2QcUqL7KC5HA+8Q0YOJT/O4zIgG69ey479n4LQMsWIfHjl ubFkZdwcPijOCp+Xx4zR/VW4ZOpGj0jKe/OB0LKi4XyzAduuT2fBdJssVRt/H2U= =Urh1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--