From: Alan Schmitt <alan.schmitt@polytechnique.org>
To: Karl Voit <devnull@Karl-Voit.at>
Cc: Karl Voit <news1142@Karl-Voit.at>, emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
Subject: Re: org-review is on melpa
Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2016 08:50:09 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m2h99pmuse.fsf@charm-ecran.irisa.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2016-09-08T12-52-48@devnull.Karl-Voit.at> (Karl Voit's message of "Thu, 8 Sep 2016 13:02:04 +0200")
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1436 bytes --]
Hello Karl,
On 2016-09-08 13:02, Karl Voit <devnull@Karl-Voit.at> writes:
> Hallo Alan,
>
> * Alan Schmitt <alan.schmitt@polytechnique.org> wrote:
>>
>> After using this for a couple of years, I=E2=80=99ve finally taken the time=
>> to
>> put it on Melpa. Org-review (https://melpa.org/#/org-review) is a set of
>> functions to maintain review dates for entries, so that you may generate
>> agenda view of things to review. I use it every Friday during my weekly
>> review to review projects and single tasks.
>
> I'm not familiar with org-review. I just read the description on the
> page mentioned above.
>
> I don't particularly want to discuss this here because I think
> that I don't need org-review for now. However, I do think that you
> should elaborate on the fact that org-review sounds very similar to
> a simple recurring todo. What are the benefits compared to recurring
> todos?
One could indeed use recurring todos on tasks like “Review Project A”
and “Review Project B”, but it requires creating such additional tasks
for each project. Org-review lets you attach another timestamp,
different from the Scheduled or Deadline ones which define when the task
has to be done, to schedule reviews of the task or project within the
task or project.
Best,
Alan
--
OpenPGP Key ID : 040D0A3B4ED2E5C7
Monthly Athmospheric CO₂, Mauna Loa Obs. 2015-08: 398.93, 2016-08: 402.25
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 454 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-09-09 6:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-09-07 5:49 org-review is on melpa Alan Schmitt
2016-09-07 6:25 ` Clément Pit--Claudel
2016-09-08 11:02 ` Karl Voit
2016-09-09 6:50 ` Alan Schmitt [this message]
2016-09-10 20:12 ` Karl Voit
2016-09-12 7:15 ` Alan Schmitt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.orgmode.org/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m2h99pmuse.fsf@charm-ecran.irisa.fr \
--to=alan.schmitt@polytechnique.org \
--cc=devnull@Karl-Voit.at \
--cc=emacs-orgmode@gnu.org \
--cc=news1142@Karl-Voit.at \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).