From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bastien Subject: Re: Re: A nice feature to suggest Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2007 20:54:03 +0100 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HLPRe-0002Ki-0O for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Feb 2007 14:54:06 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HLPRd-0002KK-G8 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Feb 2007 14:54:05 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HLPRd-0002KH-5I for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Feb 2007 14:54:05 -0500 Received: from mx-out.libertysurf.net ([213.36.80.91] helo=mail.libertysurf.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1HLPRc-0007bp-HA for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Feb 2007 14:54:04 -0500 Received: from hartur.local (91.164.56.83) by mail.libertysurf.net (7.3.117.3) id 45B4BB5400801980 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Feb 2007 20:52:14 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Leo's message of "Fri\, 23 Feb 2007 04\:56\:03 +0000") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Leo writes: >>> For example, if I set "#+ARCHIVE: ::* Archived Tasks" and ARCHIVE tag >>> "* Archived Tasks", then future archiving (org-archive-subtree) will >>> create another "* Archived Tasks". Is this intended? >> >> I have fixed this bug for 4.66. Is there then still need for an >> additional way to lock entries from unfolding? Maybe not directly related, but still: what about my past suggestion of a static (unfoldable) but active headline? The syntax i suggested for it was like: **: a headline It would be convenient when you need to store inline tasks that are neither proper headlines nor list items. Such a headline wouldn't (un)fold, not because its content must stay invisible, but because it has no content. Does that make sense ? Regards, -- Bastien