From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: John Wiegley Subject: Re: Using CEDET modules from Emacs core Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2017 18:15:03 -0800 Message-ID: References: <87k29d7zvw.fsf@engster.org> <87fuk08i01.fsf@engster.org> <87d1f36xnc.fsf@engster.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51272) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ccjh0-0000G5-UD for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Feb 2017 21:15:12 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ccjgz-0006oo-PF for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Feb 2017 21:15:10 -0500 In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Thu, 02 Feb 2017 23:24:55 -0500") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: Stefan Monnier Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org >>>>> "SM" == Stefan Monnier writes: SM> For one, I'd like to see more major modes come with support for Semantic SM> right in the major mode's own definition (rather than have it part of SM> CEDET). E.g. for Elisp mode, CC-mode, ... SM> The idea is to get to the point where Semantic support is just another SM> thing that a major mode should aim to support alongside syntax-tables, SM> indentation, font-lock, outline-minor-mode, ... Is the semantic support really at the point of warranting that? Does it have many users currently? Is it something major-modes would want to include default support for? The last time I tried it, for C++ code, it was far too slow. Are you saying it's effective for other languages, like Python or Javascript or Go? -- John Wiegley GPG fingerprint = 4710 CF98 AF9B 327B B80F http://newartisans.com 60E1 46C4 BD1A 7AC1 4BA2