From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Leo Subject: Re: Org-mode version 5.01 Date: Tue, 03 Jul 2007 14:20:39 +0100 Message-ID: References: <02fd7c0eda862268ec5e7b120b793663@science.uva.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1I5iKp-0000MR-D0 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Jul 2007 09:22:27 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1I5iKo-0000M2-VQ for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Jul 2007 09:22:27 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1I5iKo-0000Lx-Me for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Jul 2007 09:22:26 -0400 Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2] helo=ciao.gmane.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1I5iKo-0003rW-7n for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Jul 2007 09:22:26 -0400 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1I5iKj-0003Z2-GW for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Jul 2007 15:22:21 +0200 Received: from sl392.st-edmunds.cam.ac.uk ([131.111.223.202]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 03 Jul 2007 15:22:21 +0200 Received: from sdl.web by sl392.st-edmunds.cam.ac.uk with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 03 Jul 2007 15:22:21 +0200 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org On 02/07/2007, Carsten Dominik wrote: > * Incompatible changes > > - When using LEVEL=N in a tags search, things have changed if > you are also using `org-odd-levels-only'. If you are using > only odd levels (i.e. 1 or 3 or 5... stars), LEVEL=2 will > now refer to 3 stars, LEVEL=3 to 5 stars etc. Many thanks > to Leo (or blame him if you must) who has convinced me > that this is the better convention. I hope eventually the name `org-odd-levels-only' is less confusing. Is `org-odd-stars-only' better? Regards, -- Leo (GPG Key: 9283AA3F)