From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alan Schmitt Subject: Re: [patch] ox-koma-letter Date: Mon, 04 Mar 2013 08:19:58 +0100 Message-ID: References: <87vc9gkund.fsf@pank.eu> <877glpptuj.fsf@pank.eu> <87obf1zcor.fsf@pank.eu> <876218wg2m.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:38439) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UCPgp-0004pD-FY for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Mar 2013 02:20:05 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UCPgn-0000xL-3g for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Mar 2013 02:20:03 -0500 Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr ([192.134.164.104]:38772) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UCPgm-0000uS-Sx for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Mar 2013 02:20:01 -0500 In-reply-to: <876218wg2m.fsf@gmail.com> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Nicolas Goaziou Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org, Rasmus Hi Nicolas, Nicolas Goaziou writes: > Hello, > > Alan Schmitt writes: > >> Rasmus writes: >> >>> Export the following to LaTeX: >>> >>> #+BEGIN_SRC Org >>> #+TITLE:test >>> #+LATEX_HEADER:\newcommand{test}{\textsc{ps}:this is a test} >>> #+LATEX_HEADER:\newcommand{ttest}{\textsc{ps}\:this is a test} >>> #+LATEX_HEADER:\newcommand{tttest}{\textsc{ps}\\:this is a test} >>> #+LATEX_HEADER:\newcommand{ttttest}{\textsc{ps}$\colon$this is a test} >>> >>> this is a test >>> #+END_SRC > > I didn't read the thread carefully, but there should be a space after > "#+LATEX_HEADER:". Yes, this changes everything, thanks for spotting it. So I guess the only part of the letter design I'm worried about is having a 'ps' with several paragraphs. (I guess it's related to the footnote with multiple paragraphs questions, but I guess the two blank lines approach is only for footnotes.) Alan