From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: John Kitchin <jkitchin@andrew.cmu.edu>
Subject: Re: org-preview-latex-fragment for @@latex:stuff@@?
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 14:42:24 -0500
Message-ID: <m2d1v0a4f3.fsf@andrew.cmu.edu>
References: <m2ziy6an9o.fsf@andrew.cmu.edu> <87wpta17ey.fsf@gmx.us>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60439)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <johnrkitchin@gmail.com>) id 1a0x0R-0000mx-JL
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Nov 2015 14:42:32 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <johnrkitchin@gmail.com>) id 1a0x0M-0006Yi-BI
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Nov 2015 14:42:31 -0500
Received: from mail-qg0-x22c.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400d:c04::22c]:35753)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <johnrkitchin@gmail.com>) id 1a0x0M-0006Ya-7Y
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Nov 2015 14:42:26 -0500
Received: by qgec40 with SMTP id c40so121162065qge.2
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Mon, 23 Nov 2015 11:42:26 -0800 (PST)
In-reply-to: <87wpta17ey.fsf@gmx.us>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Rasmus <rasmus@gmx.us>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

True enough! I wasn't thinking very large when I had the question in
mind! I end up with a lot of chemical formulas like this
@@latex:\ce{H_{2}O}@@  in my writing because the {} inside the {} makes
them render incorrectly in LaTeX, and I was looking for a way to
visualize them.

your points are good ones though, there could be many things that don't
make sense to preview in these.



Rasmus writes:

> John Kitchin <jkitchin@andrew.cmu.edu> writes:
>
>> Should the inline latex fragments like @@latex:\ce{H_{2}O}@@ be
>> previewable in org files with org-preview-latex-fragment?
>>
>> They don't seem to be, and just wanted to confirm that is intended
>> behavior.
>
> Is there a general solution for this?  E.g. how should these cases be
> previewed:
>
>     My text @@latex:% my end of line comment@@
>     @@latex:\input{myfile}@@
>
> Rasmus

--
Professor John Kitchin
Doherty Hall A207F
Department of Chemical Engineering
Carnegie Mellon University
Pittsburgh, PA 15213
412-268-7803
@johnkitchin
http://kitchingroup.cheme.cmu.edu