From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id UCqGIj2R318OMAAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 20 Dec 2020 18:00:29 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1 with LMTPS id sGw9Hj2R319gJQAAbx9fmQ (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 20 Dec 2020 18:00:29 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A35B394030E for ; Sun, 20 Dec 2020 18:00:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:41888 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kr30N-0006QL-HO for larch@yhetil.org; Sun, 20 Dec 2020 13:00:27 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:34632) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kqn6a-0007EK-G3; Sat, 19 Dec 2020 20:01:48 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:60157) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kqn6a-00078F-80; Sat, 19 Dec 2020 20:01:48 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kqmPF-0003TS-Lc; Sat, 19 Dec 2020 19:17:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#45091: 27.1; M-x org-table-paste-rectangle Resent-From: Tak Kunihiro Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2020 00:17:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 45091 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs,org-mode X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: =?UTF-8?Q?Jo=C3=A3o_?= =?UTF-8?Q?T=C3=A1vora?= Received: via spool by 45091-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B45091.160842336113258 (code B ref 45091); Sun, 20 Dec 2020 00:17:01 +0000 Received: (at 45091) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Dec 2020 00:16:01 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43446 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kqmO2-0003RF-Ie for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 19 Dec 2020 19:16:01 -0500 Received: from mail-pj1-f47.google.com ([209.85.216.47]:39231) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kqmNe-0003QZ-5t for 45091@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 19 Dec 2020 19:15:41 -0500 Received: by mail-pj1-f47.google.com with SMTP id hk16so3874526pjb.4 for <45091@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 19 Dec 2020 16:15:22 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=AfLIcUVEZhuOUhFkwVDI10P1MBPql2hPF94N/xCxIcY=; b=aKJp/uo9QX2RYDkqTL/hbxEDqRF5Lj/AP04lTbfN1T+pWfW6xVDJYISVRXf3vneqdv yYD8YhUMXZbesEHonTwpHsf68InRomX/hMv/8nzexrTuvkx8LquF/3bfEKfcv5yBuGaG 03a/8FphRFeBIrfE+UxRbIpYewFPefvyTNSLrZ7L2SSe9ca7X54lj7nvnvrM/aMEwHDF C2sorsowpUbjU9T/vcaZvFNJwjxM0y4ZfaojBdYrMYpYgFyrtc8EwLNc+TX53A6yFHzw zILVQrwHPURPtWWeOkjfGTNTip3OusCQwZeYnwlClALCieWouSWyU1YEoSNaqlqVoWBh a7Ug== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:cc:subject:references:date :in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=AfLIcUVEZhuOUhFkwVDI10P1MBPql2hPF94N/xCxIcY=; b=JXrs/IbsdpC27iWNpgmib13ykJFRoQh+YpTC+jpKTbKRl/+lXoISTxlOoKJuRMAbqB HXgZqUmRUlOqNKuD/DkLKOrsI/20m5K+5G22gRI6UFaNfhNNPDykPHhquuyzs8FG3uPc KzjHFAYkSOCsn63+n0tGzjiJwfvHC1ZkjXCoNcDFC70l1craRUEBU5QU0LWKyHZE/1m8 8Vqv7OJ565xllkaFIA5bqQmQ90JcAGWon6v505H/mBO1N/uJnEd+0fCG229kqcdpBJ6e zFZZKrY0Un+sHoVU1L2ZMBN264sfr/WUg2nr3pj/Zj6wbk55NPiNn9gZ1RCvXR1jh5pK WKZw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5323BS5VekGcNqhXOMgH5mJoT/G68hssifHOIh1pEq5BZprKFjq4 KGCQkDffPxccu1T2/zk3KPw= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxG/dOHQd95YZbW31O5Buoc8bvjDEDoxZtDMd6qb3np7RSafKMyaZv+hx6/2vghZqe8i2kD7A== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:390b:: with SMTP id ob11mr11100245pjb.66.1608423302715; Sat, 19 Dec 2020 16:15:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from DreamBook2017.local ([2400:4153:47a0:f310:759d:b768:2c82:5c9f]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id f15sm11153041pju.49.2020.12.19.16.15.00 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sat, 19 Dec 2020 16:15:01 -0800 (PST) From: Tak Kunihiro X-Google-Original-From: Tak Kunihiro References: <831rg1aapc.fsf@gnu.org> <87360g44fe.fsf@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2020 09:14:58 +0900 In-Reply-To: <87360g44fe.fsf@gmail.com> ("=?UTF-8?Q?Jo=C3=A3o_?= =?UTF-8?Q?T=C3=A1vora?="'s message of "Tue, 08 Dec 2020 17:02:13 +0000") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (darwin) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 20 Dec 2020 12:59:44 -0500 X-BeenThere: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Tak Kunihiro , tkk@misasa.okayama-u.ac.jp, Eli Zaretskii , 45091@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Spam-Score: 0.28 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail (headers rsa verify failed) header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=aKJp/uo9; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=gmail.com (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of emacs-orgmode-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=emacs-orgmode-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: A35B394030E X-Spam-Score: 0.28 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn1.migadu.com X-TUID: rYfZyESA3gfF > I'll keep looking a bit, but at this point it doesn't seem to have > anything to do with the antiblink feature. I might be wrong, but I > think that only shows up first in the messages buffer because it's > unlucky enough to be one of the first users of syntax-ppss after a > command. I confirmed that I can reproduce the problem with 27.1.90. Although the recipe seems complicated, I see the problem quite often when I work with LaTeX-mode. I still have to stick on 26.3. I appreciate if the problem would be fixed.