From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dave Abrahams Subject: Re: Feature request: Select links by description [7.4] Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2011 21:35:34 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87ipwqvksf.fsf@gnu.org> <87ipwmhqcx.fsf@gnu.org> <8739nqq6ha.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:51249) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R4NRd-0004ll-FB for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Sep 2011 21:42:22 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R4NRb-0004yG-9f for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Sep 2011 21:42:21 -0400 Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:56211) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R4NRb-0004x6-0J for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Sep 2011 21:42:19 -0400 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R4NRZ-0005IJ-KC for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Sep 2011 03:42:17 +0200 Received: from 207-172-223-249.c3-0.smr-ubr3.sbo-smr.ma.static.cable.rcn.com ([207.172.223.249]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 16 Sep 2011 03:42:17 +0200 Received: from dave by 207-172-223-249.c3-0.smr-ubr3.sbo-smr.ma.static.cable.rcn.com with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 16 Sep 2011 03:42:17 +0200 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org on Thu Sep 15 2011, Dave Abrahams wrote: > on Tue Feb 15 2011, Dave Abrahams wrote: > >> On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 11:14 PM, Bastien wrote: >>> Dave Abrahams writes: >> >>> >>>> How about just always showing the link as it will be presented to the >>>> user first, followed by the raw link?  Then everything will be >>>> consistent. >>> >>> I don't see how it would prevent the problem I've been mentionning: we >>> will still have a mix of descriptions and raw links... or maybe I miss >>> something? >> >> If it's really paramount to avoid a mixture, you must hide all >> descriptions, which would be a step in the wrong direction for me. >> >>> I'm willing to improve the display of links, keep brainstorming! >> >> I'm out of ideas. Leading off with the displayed form of the link is >> the best I can do. > > > > The best is the enemy of the good and all that... is there any reason > this can't be made to work? I actually have some fairly detailed new ideas for design changes in this area if anyone is interested. -- Dave Abrahams BoostPro Computing http://www.boostpro.com