From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: John Wiegley Subject: Re: bug in org-habits Date: Tue, 03 Nov 2015 15:55:20 -0500 Message-ID: References: <871tc83p01.fsf@flynn.nichework.com> <84io5j1k5h.fsf@gmail.com> <84611j19hk.fsf@gmail.com> <5638C2A1.2090801@iancu.ch> <87h9l32gfc.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87d1vq3mh4.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <874mh23iw0.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58304) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ztic5-0004pE-0d for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Nov 2015 15:55:30 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ztic1-0007wh-Ph for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Nov 2015 15:55:28 -0500 Received: from mail-qg0-x235.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400d:c04::235]:33608) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ztic1-0007wd-Lf for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Nov 2015 15:55:25 -0500 Received: by qgeo38 with SMTP id o38so24636381qge.0 for ; Tue, 03 Nov 2015 12:55:25 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <874mh23iw0.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> (Nicolas Goaziou's message of "Tue, 03 Nov 2015 21:52:47 +0100") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Stelian Iancu Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org >>>>> Nicolas Goaziou writes: > I'd rather not have syntax too much customizable, for portability, ease of > maintenance, too. There are already too many mistakes in that area. Thanks for discussing this with me, Nicolas. I appreciate there may be technical complexities involved. Could we special-case allow PROPERTIES to be the *very last thing* in an entry? I don't need it to float anywhere else. I just like it to be at the end. > If you need to end your entry with a drawer, couldn't you put any of them > there? You can even have one there named "PROPERTIES". But it wouldn't be the true PROPERTIES, would it? Most of my entries look like this (and I have many thousands of them): ** TODO Update auto insurance cards :Home:ATTACH: SCHEDULED: <2016-03-11 Fri +6m> - State "DONE" from "TODO" [2015-09-11 Fri 11:28] - State "WAITING" from "TODO" [2015-07-22 Wed 19:48] - State "DONE" from "STARTED" [2014-12-13 Sat 15:56] - State "DONE" from "TODO" [2014-03-31 Mon 03:11] - State "CANCELED" from "TODO" [2013-12-11 Wed 19:23] - State "CANCELED" from "TODO" [2013-05-21 Tue 12:30] - State "DONE" from "TODO" [2012-05-17 Thu 22:24] - State "CANCELED" from "TODO" [2011-04-23 Sat 22:04] - State "TODO" from "DONE" [2010-10-23 Sat 21:54] - State "DONE" from "TODO" [2010-10-08 Fri 14:26] :PROPERTIES: :ID: B1F3D3F6-9F39-4899-9AF8-93E019E7C6BB :CREATED: [2010-05-08 Sat 17:34] :LAST_REPEAT: [2015-09-11 Fri 11:28] :Attachments: AutoInsuranceIdCards.pdf :END: I suppose I've just become familiar with seeing :PROPERTIES: as the "period" at the end of the entry, and I'll like to keep it there if we can devise a technical answer that does not make life more difficult for you. John