From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: John Wiegley Subject: Re: Allowing loose ordering in Org files Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2015 14:35:02 -0800 Message-ID: References: <871tc83p01.fsf@flynn.nichework.com> <5638C2A1.2090801@iancu.ch> <87h9l32gfc.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87d1vq3mh4.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <874mh23iw0.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <878u6eu5wg.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <315DDEDC-1BD9-4680-A8C8-B36821EB931C@gmail.com> <874mh2u2w0.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <87ziytyl3z.fsf@free.fr> <877flqskci.fsf@gmail.com> <87vb99zlb0.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <87fv0dzj21.fsf@Rainer.invalid> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60637) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZwHVN-0001Nb-U7 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 17:35:10 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZwHVK-0007Zr-KA for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 17:35:09 -0500 Received: from mail-pa0-x233.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400e:c03::233]:34443) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZwHVK-0007ZM-Fs for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 17:35:06 -0500 Received: by padhx2 with SMTP id hx2so10077787pad.1 for ; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 14:35:06 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87fv0dzj21.fsf@Rainer.invalid> (Achim Gratz's message of "Tue, 10 Nov 2015 21:38:30 +0100") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Achim Gratz Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org >>>>> Achim Gratz writes: > So isn't your request rather to hide the properties drawer better by > default? You were _only_ talking about the UX in this whole thread and that > might be a lot easier to adapt while not changing the way Org syntax is > defined. Good call, Achim! I became too focused on the problem, and missed the real point. > As I said above, the solution may well be different than both what you want > to keep and what Org offers now. I don't find that thread particularly > annoying, btw. Thanks. John