From: Alan Schmitt <alan.schmitt@polytechnique.org>
To: Bastien <bzg@gnu.org>
Cc: emacs-orgmode <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: org-review-schedule
Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2014 13:16:02 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m27g6lbmdp.fsf@polytechnique.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <877g6leltk.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> (Bastien's message of "Sat, 19 Apr 2014 10:14:35 +0200")
Hi Bastien,
Thanks a lot for these, I'll look into them. I have a couple questions
in the meantime.
On 2014-04-19 10:14, Bastien <bzg@gnu.org> writes:
> - maybe you can use "naked" timestamps like 2014-04-19 sam.
> instead of inactive ones, this way using "[" in the agenda
> will not create false positives by inserting entries with
> a REVIEW property.
OK. I'm not sure what "[" is supposed to do in the agenda, and I don't
see how it could interfere. (I like inactive time stamps because I can
easily adjust their dates with C-left and C-right, is it possible to do
so with naked timestamps?)
> - I infer from a quick read that this works for the agenda but
> I guess this could work for both the agenda and Org buffers;
Yes, clearly.
> Since you took inspirationg from org-expiry, I guess some of
> the comments above would apply there too... feel free to hack
> into this directions for both org-expiry.el and org-review.el!
> Actually, maybe both should be merged somehow, since expiring
> is just reviewing entries to interactively delete them.
Yes. But I should think about it more to see where I could take this.
Thanks again,
Alan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-04-19 11:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-04-18 20:27 org-review-schedule Alan Schmitt
2014-04-19 8:14 ` org-review-schedule Bastien
2014-04-19 11:16 ` Alan Schmitt [this message]
2014-04-19 11:51 ` org-review-schedule Bastien
2014-04-24 11:51 ` org-review-schedule Alan Schmitt
2014-04-25 6:51 ` org-review-schedule Nicolas Goaziou
2014-04-25 7:43 ` org-review-schedule Alan Schmitt
2014-04-25 8:02 ` org-review-schedule Nicolas Goaziou
2014-04-27 8:09 ` org-review-schedule Alan Schmitt
2014-04-28 7:20 ` org-review-schedule AW
2014-04-28 11:29 ` org-review-schedule Alan Schmitt
2014-05-06 9:27 ` org-review-schedule Bastien
2014-05-15 10:07 ` org-review-schedule Bastien
2014-05-20 12:48 ` org-review-schedule Alan Schmitt
2014-05-21 12:08 ` org-review-schedule Bastien
2014-05-21 12:58 ` org-review-schedule Alan Schmitt
2014-04-26 8:57 ` org-review-schedule Alan Schmitt
2014-04-26 10:38 ` org-review-schedule Thorsten Jolitz
2014-04-26 12:25 ` org-review-schedule Nicolas Goaziou
2014-04-27 8:08 ` org-review-schedule Alan Schmitt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.orgmode.org/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m27g6lbmdp.fsf@polytechnique.org \
--to=alan.schmitt@polytechnique.org \
--cc=bzg@gnu.org \
--cc=emacs-orgmode@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).