From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Martin =?utf-8?B?WXJqw7Zsw6Q=?= Subject: Re: a new csl - citation style lisp ;) Date: Sat, 12 Dec 2015 11:31:47 +0200 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40941) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a7gWz-0002kz-5Q for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 12 Dec 2015 04:31:58 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a7gWu-0004Hj-71 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 12 Dec 2015 04:31:57 -0500 Received: from mail-lf0-x22d.google.com ([2a00:1450:4010:c07::22d]:35714) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a7gWu-0004HC-0M for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 12 Dec 2015 04:31:52 -0500 Received: by lfdl133 with SMTP id l133so92501667lfd.2 for ; Sat, 12 Dec 2015 01:31:51 -0800 (PST) In-reply-to: List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: John Kitchin Cc: Org Mode Hi John, John Kitchin writes: > Hi everyone, > > I got curious enough about citation processing to draft an elisp-based > citeproc for orgmode. You can see the code here: > > https://github.com/jkitchin/org-ref/tree/master/citeproc I gave it a spin and it was very easy to set up as an org-ref user. Great work so far. I think an Elisp based implementation has many strengths like you mentioned in the readme. > It is loosely based on the xml-CSL file, but in lisp. The principle is > the same, there is a csl file in lisp that contains formatting > information, and a processor that works on my org-ref links to replace > them with formatted citations and entries. What would be the best way moving forward? How easy would it be to implement a converter for xml-CSL files? Or would it be better to support the xml-CSL format directly to avoid duplicate work? > It certainly isn't complete, bug-free, or stable yet and might still not solve > note-based styles, but it is pretty powerful already. Do you already accept bug reports and pull requests on Github? Best regards, Martin Yrjölä