From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Christian Moe <mail@christianmoe.com>
Subject: Re: Babel CALL no longer produces HTML output
Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2016 19:00:48 +0200
Message-ID: <m27fcbt1hb.fsf@christianmoe.com>
References: <87r3akzh3c.fsf@iki.fi> <m2bn1ott8t.fsf@christianmoe.com>
	<877fcc5wwl.fsf@iki.fi>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37978)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@christianmoe.com>) id 1bRMlr-0000XH-KI
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Jul 2016 13:00:56 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@christianmoe.com>) id 1bRMll-0002Gu-JU
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Jul 2016 13:00:54 -0400
Received: from mail2.b1.hitrost.net ([91.185.211.205]:55928)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@christianmoe.com>) id 1bRMll-0002Gg-C7
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Jul 2016 13:00:49 -0400
In-reply-to: <877fcc5wwl.fsf@iki.fi>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Emacs-orgmode"
	<emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Jarmo Hurri <jarmo.hurri@iki.fi>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org


Jarmo Hurri writes:

>> Try:
>>
>>     #+CALL: rekursio-pystyviivat[:noweb yes]() :results export html
>
> Greetings Christian,
>
> for some reason that did not improve the end result.

Sorry, I had that solution freshly in mind from a different problem
(involving #+INCLUDE, not #+CALL), and typed without thinking. I see
Charles Berry had the right answer.

Yours,
Christian