From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Eric Schulte" Subject: Re: Re: Sourceforge community award Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 22:29:13 -0700 Message-ID: References: <4AA80F05-FECC-427D-BD20-E5AD3F273C1E@gmail.com> <4A2F52EA.6080105@gmail.com> <87bpouo9v6.fsf@fastmail.fm> <87my8ejs14.fsf@mean.albasani.net> <0087C93B-1BC2-4942-9B05-A372ED20E0D2@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MEzKO-0006T6-90 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Jun 2009 01:29:24 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MEzKJ-0006R6-T7 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Jun 2009 01:29:23 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=58346 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MEzKJ-0006Qr-Ld for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Jun 2009 01:29:19 -0400 Received: from rv-out-0708.google.com ([209.85.198.247]:32890) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MEzKJ-0000Z0-6I for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Jun 2009 01:29:19 -0400 Received: by rv-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id c5so1252516rvf.6 for ; Thu, 11 Jun 2009 22:29:18 -0700 (PDT) List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Carsten Dominik Cc: Memnon Anon , emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Carsten Dominik writes: > On Jun 12, 2009, at 12:59 AM, Memnon Anon wrote: > >> Hi! >> >> Leo writes: >> >>> On 2009-06-11 21:49 +0100, Carsten Dominik wrote: >>>> I am attaching the picture to this email, you can also retrieve it >>>> from >>>> >>>> http://orgmode.org/Org-mode-scc.png >>> >>> That screen shot looks very beautiful. There's one minor glitch. The >>> font is non anti-alias. >> I just want to second this point about font anit-ailising. For better or worse, I'm scared that for people scanning through many pictures, the only take-away from this image will be that the font looks like it's from the early 90s. Best -- Eric