From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas S. Dye Subject: Re: Stable releases Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2015 07:32:43 -1000 Message-ID: References: <55CA2E6B.4060102@gmail.com> <87fv3gv6rj.fsf@gnu.org> <20150818204009.GW25378@cardamom.adamsinfoserv.com> <87zj1nf3pr.fsf@gmx.us> <87d1yh36lf.fsf@gnu.org> <20150821072107.GB31789@chitra.no-ip.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49929) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZTCf9-0003B1-8i for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 22 Aug 2015 13:33:04 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZTCf5-0006qx-5W for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 22 Aug 2015 13:33:03 -0400 Received: from gproxy10-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com ([69.89.20.226]:52210) by eggs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZTCf4-0006oZ-VK for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 22 Aug 2015 13:32:59 -0400 In-reply-to: <20150821072107.GB31789@chitra.no-ip.org> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Suvayu Ali Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Suvayu Ali writes: > Hi Tom, > > On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 01:56:43PM -1000, Thomas S. Dye wrote: >> >> Bastien writes: >> >> > Hi Rasmus, >> > >> > Rasmus writes: >> > >> >> One data point: I can absolutely not be bothered using anything that is >> >> not at least in contrib. >> > >> > Just out of curiosity: don't you use the Emacs package system at all? >> > >> > I used not to use it, but thanks to recent improvements, I find it >> > quite good now -- and I would not mind using Org packages from there. >> >> The package system appears to be quite popular in the Org mode world. > > The summary you provide below is very impressive, thanks for compiling > it. It would be a nice addition to worg, with a date attached to it of > course! It's bound to go stale at some point :-p. > > However I would like to point out, the documentation for many of these > extensions is rather spreadout and thin. So I agree with Rasmus, as in, > contrib is much more accessible, but I think it also encourages authors > to contribute documentation on worg (after all it's in the official > repository). That said, I'm not sure why some of the extensions, like > ox-reveal, are _not_ in contrib. AFAIU, it's quite mature. Rasmus' ranking of org mode sources interested me, so I tried to satisfy my curiosity is all. I hope you didn't think I was disagreeing with his decision not to be bothered using Org mode packages. I certainly understand it. I made the same decision wrt the elpa version of Org mode after struggling with mixed installations--life is too short! I do have a technical question that you or someone else on the list might be able to answer for me. When I downloaded the Babel languages from melpa just now, the elpa version of Org mode was also downloaded and installed, even though I didn't ask for it. Why is this? Can it be disabled? Must the elpa Org mode be installed and activated in order for the Org mode packages to work? All the best, Tom -- Thomas S. Dye http://www.tsdye.com