From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Leo Subject: Re: version 4.56 different in emacs Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 14:11:38 +0000 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Gp3hc-0004gu-TC for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Nov 2006 09:12:53 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Gp3hZ-0004dW-VY for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Nov 2006 09:12:51 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Gp3hZ-0004d3-1C for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Nov 2006 09:12:49 -0500 Received: from [80.91.229.2] (helo=ciao.gmane.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.52) id 1Gp3hW-0001rY-Ih for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Nov 2006 09:12:47 -0500 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1Gp3h7-0004Xh-RD for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Nov 2006 15:12:21 +0100 Received: from sl392.st-edmunds.cam.ac.uk ([131.111.223.202]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 28 Nov 2006 15:12:21 +0100 Received: from sdl.web by sl392.st-edmunds.cam.ac.uk with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 28 Nov 2006 15:12:21 +0100 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org On Tuesday, 28 Nov 2006, Carsten Dominik wrote: > On Nov 22, 2006, at 20:48, Leo wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> This is just my curiosity. I diff org.el (from emacs) and the one from >> Carsten's website. Although they have same version number, I see the >> following differences: > > > While I am not installing new features into the Emacs CVS version > currently, > I still do fix significant bugs. I guess it is sloppy to not change the > version number in Emacs to, say, 4.56a. This specific bug could cause > the overlayed custom time format to differ by several hours (depending > on your time zone) from the actual value given in the time stamp. > > - Carsten > Thanks. I like the pace of org development and I think most of the users are using the latest version anyway. -- Leo