From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Christian Moe <mail@christianmoe.com>
Subject: Re: seeking advice on use of drawers vs blocks
Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2016 11:05:34 +0200
Message-ID: <m237qxwzz5.fsf@christianmoe.com>
References: <57035782.3050202@gmail.com> <m28u0sze1f.fsf@christianmoe.com>
	<57061B24.2070708@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42601)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@christianmoe.com>) id 1ao5sb-0000CG-1J
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Apr 2016 05:05:34 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@christianmoe.com>) id 1ao5sW-00056I-Qq
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Apr 2016 05:05:32 -0400
Received: from mail2.b1.hitrost.net ([91.185.211.205]:25848)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@christianmoe.com>) id 1ao5sW-000569-L2
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Apr 2016 05:05:28 -0400
In-reply-to: <57061B24.2070708@gmail.com>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Christian Wittern <cwittern@gmail.com>
Cc: Org Mode Mailing List <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>


Hi,

The syntax document is at http://orgmode.org/worg/dev/org-syntax.html.
It defines drawers as a "greater element", and says that greater
elements may contain other greater elements. Exporting a sample block
wrapped in a drawer works fine with the d:t option. Other complications
may arise, though...

Yours,
Christian

Christian Wittern writes:

> Dear Christian,
> Thank you for your feedback.
> On 2016-04-05 16:54, Christian Moe wrote:
>> On the third hand, have you considered wrapping a block in a drawer?
> No, I had not considered this.  Let me play around with that idea for a
> while. Is this syntactically allowed? I remember there was a document
> discussed a while ago that would define org syntax, but I can't remember now
> where this document is.  Does anybody remember?
>
> All the best,
>
> Christian