From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peter Davis Subject: Re: Multipart/Alternative reply to email? Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2016 10:23:46 -0400 Message-ID: References: <6sw6c7y498q8zy.fsf@BO-C02PWE1MG8WN.home> <878u18t1c4.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48789) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aj6Az-00082A-7h for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 24 Mar 2016 10:23:57 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aj6At-0005oO-5d for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 24 Mar 2016 10:23:53 -0400 Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.25]:53993) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aj6At-0005oK-1r for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 24 Mar 2016 10:23:47 -0400 Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C69520A21 for ; Thu, 24 Mar 2016 10:23:46 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <878u18t1c4.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> (Eric S. Fraga's message of "Thu, 24 Mar 2016 14:08:59 +0000") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Eric S Fraga writes: > On Thursday, 24 Mar 2016 at 09:51, Peter Davis wrote: >> I've used org-mime to send MIME emails that are multipart/alternative >> with both text and HTML parts. It's great, especially for >> including tables, etc. >> >> Is there a way to reply to message with this? > > Not sure what you mean. You can htmlize the reply=E2=80=A6 as I've done h= ere (apologies for email purists for the HTML content here ;-). > =E2=80=93 Ah, so you just reply to the text part in Gnus or whatever, but then use or= g-mime to html-ize that? Cool, though some of the HTML-ness of the original message may be lost. Thanks! -pd