From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: tsd@tsdye.com (Thomas S. Dye) Subject: Re: Macro question with new texinfo exporter Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2013 10:21:20 -1000 Message-ID: References: <877gmvalzn.fsf@gmail.com> <87vcae53fi.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87haly96xi.fsf@gmail.com> <87zjzqejhz.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87wquumhqk.fsf@gmail.com> <87wquth35i.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87ehh12gjp.fsf@gmail.com> <87pq0f3ovx.fsf@Rainer.invalid> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:53970) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U2SY4-0006de-Nu for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Feb 2013 15:21:55 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U2SY0-0002om-Vj for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Feb 2013 15:21:52 -0500 Received: from oproxy6-pub.bluehost.com ([67.222.54.6]:50054) by eggs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U2SY0-0002nO-ME for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Feb 2013 15:21:48 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87pq0f3ovx.fsf@Rainer.invalid> (Achim Gratz's message of "Mon, 04 Feb 2013 19:38:58 +0100") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Achim Gratz Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Aloha Achim, Achim Gratz writes: > > What were those messages? And since the presence of both features > indicates that you were previously on master, why did you switch to > maint at all (everything on maint should have been merged into master)? > >> Org-mode version 7.9.3e (7.9.3e @ /Users/dk/.emacs.d/src/org-mode/lisp/) >> cond: Symbol's function definition is void: org-e-latex-export-to-latex >> >> I'm stymied here. I'd like to be able to use the new macro code with >> the new exporter. How is that possible? > > Just update master. Thanks for looking into this. Yes, this was my confusion. I didn't understand that maint was merged with master. I thought Nicolas' reference to maint was an indication that I had to use the new code there. All the best, Tom -- Thomas S. Dye http://www.tsdye.com