From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Leo Liu Subject: Re: org-export raises stringp nil error Date: Fri, 08 Mar 2013 15:44:35 +0800 Message-ID: References: <87ip539io1.fsf@nautilus.nautilus> <87zjye96ph.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87vc928kcm.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87vc92735x.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: In-Reply-To: <87vc92735x.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> (Bastien's message of "Fri, 08 Mar 2013 08:37:30 +0100") List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Bastien Cc: Lele Gaifax , emacs-orgmode@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org List-Id: emacs-orgmode.gnu.org On 2013-03-08 15:37 +0800, Bastien wrote: > I strongly think otherwise: Emacs needs a good outline and editing > tool. outline.el is not usable enough and I can see no other Emacs > tool than Org-mode for exporting to HTML/LaTeX/ODT easily. > > I understand the temptation in terms of maintainance, but I think > maintainance problems should not take priority over usefulness of > the code. I am not doubting maintainance cost or the usefulness of the code. It is about distribution of your code to the users. I think ELPA is the way to go. Leo