From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: tsd@tsdye.com (Thomas S. Dye)
Subject: Re: Two modifications for source blocks processing (will be in
 7.9.2)
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 06:28:57 -1000
Message-ID: <m1lifw3fzq.fsf@tsdye.com>
References: <876271cjpb.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <80haql8afw.fsf@somewhere.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:58133)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <public@plane.gmane.org>) id 1TGuUG-0003Y3-9P
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 12:29:25 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <public@plane.gmane.org>) id 1TGuUA-0001nM-Bd
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 12:29:24 -0400
Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:44875)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <public@plane.gmane.org>) id 1TGuUA-0001n1-57
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 12:29:18 -0400
Received: from public by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <public@plane.gmane.org>) id 1TGuUD-0004nv-GB
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 18:29:21 +0200
In-Reply-To: <80haql8afw.fsf@somewhere.org> (Sebastien Vauban's message of
	"Wed, 26 Sep 2012 10:17:39 +0200")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Sebastien Vauban <public-wxhgmqzgwmuf-geNee64TY+gS+FvcfC7Uqw@plane.gmane.org>
Cc: public-emacs-orgmode-mXXj517/zsQ@plane.gmane.org



Hi Seb,

"Sebastien Vauban"
<wxhgmqzgwmuf-geNee64TY+gS+FvcfC7Uqw@public.gmane.org> writes:

> Hi Bastien,
>
> Bastien wrote:
>> this is to advertize two small modifications wrt source blocks
>> processing.
>>
>> 1) Please use ":results drawer" instead of ":results wrap" to insert
>>    results like this:
>>
>>    #+BEGIN_SRC emacs-lisp :results drawer
>>    (message "a")
>>    #+END_SRC
>>    
>>    #+RESULTS:
>>    :RESULTS:
>>    a
>>    :END:
>
> OK. That name is clearly better!
>
>> 2) Support for ":results org" has been removed.
>
> Why don't we have anymore "#+begin/end_org" blocks while we still have
> "#+begin_html" and "#+begin_LaTeX" blocks?  Org as the language seemed normal
> to insert blocks in Org-syntax.
>
> How will Org constructs be supported, for example headlines in the old
> "#+begin/end_org" blocks -- with the "," used for protecting the export?
>
> #+begin_src org
> ,* This is an headline
> ,This is some text.
> #+end_src
>
>>    You can either insert the results with ":results raw" or "results drawer"
>>    if you need to tell the exporter to include/exclude the results (by
>>    including/excluding the :RESULTS: drawer from export.)
>
> Will ":RESULTS:" drawers be included by default, to mimic the current support
> of "#+begin/end_org" blocks?
>
> Best regards,
>   Seb

:results org was a synonym for :results raw, so I think "small change"
here probably means that support for the synonym was dropped.

#+begin/end_org blocks should still work with the :wrap header argument,
 which hasn't been altered, IIUC.

All the best,
Tom

-- 
Thomas S. Dye
http://www.tsdye.com