Re: Two modifications for source blocks processing (will be in 7.9.2)

[tsd@tsdye.com (Thomas S. Dye)]

Hi Seb,

"Sebastien Vauban"
<wxhgmqzgwmuf-geNee64TY+gS+FvcfC7Uqw@public.gmane.org> writes:

> Hi Bastien,
>
> Bastien wrote:
>> this is to advertize two small modifications wrt source blocks
>> processing.
>>
>> 1) Please use ":results drawer" instead of ":results wrap" to insert
>>    results like this:
>>
>>    #+BEGIN_SRC emacs-lisp :results drawer
>>    (message "a")
>>    #+END_SRC
>>    
>>    #+RESULTS:
>>    :RESULTS:
>>    a
>>    :END:
>
> OK. That name is clearly better!
>
>> 2) Support for ":results org" has been removed.
>
> Why don't we have anymore "#+begin/end_org" blocks while we still have
> "#+begin_html" and "#+begin_LaTeX" blocks?  Org as the language seemed normal
> to insert blocks in Org-syntax.
>
> How will Org constructs be supported, for example headlines in the old
> "#+begin/end_org" blocks -- with the "," used for protecting the export?
>
> #+begin_src org
> ,* This is an headline
> ,This is some text.
> #+end_src
>
>>    You can either insert the results with ":results raw" or "results drawer"
>>    if you need to tell the exporter to include/exclude the results (by
>>    including/excluding the :RESULTS: drawer from export.)
>
> Will ":RESULTS:" drawers be included by default, to mimic the current support
> of "#+begin/end_org" blocks?
>
> Best regards,
>   Seb

:results org was a synonym for :results raw, so I think "small change"
here probably means that support for the synonym was dropped.

#+begin/end_org blocks should still work with the :wrap header argument,
 which hasn't been altered, IIUC.

All the best,
Tom

-- 
Thomas S. Dye
http://www.tsdye.com