From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: tsd@tsdye.com (Thomas S. Dye) Subject: Re: A manuscript on "reproducible research" introducing org-mode Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2012 08:13:32 -1000 Message-ID: References: <20110905155520.18046s4zu5o3tbwg@www.biomedicale.univ-paris5.fr> <20110908120651.18821k1s7dd2ob0g@www.biomedicale.univ-paris5.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:59173) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ryon4-0005gP-3r for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Feb 2012 13:13:47 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ryomz-0001Z3-8O for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Feb 2012 13:13:46 -0500 Received: from oproxy5-pub.bluehost.com ([67.222.38.55]:48297) by eggs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ryomz-0001YR-2A for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Feb 2012 13:13:41 -0500 In-Reply-To: (Samuel Wales's message of "Thu, 16 Feb 2012 13:59:24 -0700") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Samuel Wales Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org, Stephen Eglen Samuel Wales writes: > As a followup to my last comment, this explains how Stapel > fooled almost everybody and kept raw data hidden: > > http://chronicle.com/blogs/percolator/the-fraud-who-fooled-almost-everyone/27917 > > And NYT "Fraud Case Seen as a Red Flag for Psychology > Research" which has a raw data take: > > http://www.nytimes.com/2011/11/03/health/research/noted-dutch-psychologist-stapel-accused-of-research-fraud.html > > Thanks for the videos, Stephen, I will check them out. > > I have been running across scads of fraud stories and interesting > studies on conflict of interest, reliability of research results, etc. > It's all over the place, just scattered and nobody pays much > attention, perhaps not wanting to believe it. > > Reproducible research aims directly at this stuff. Chapeau! > > Samuel I just ran across this article on reproducible research that some of you might find interesting. http://journal.r-project.org/archive/2011-2/RJournal_2011-2_Lundholm.pdf All the best, Tom -- Thomas S. Dye http://www.tsdye.com