From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Leo Subject: Re: Poll: Who is using these commands Date: Sun, 09 May 2010 19:03:50 +0100 Message-ID: References: <20100508202159.GA32505@taupan.ath.cx> <4BE5DF9C.909@gmail.com> <245881E6-B69D-4E6F-A1B1-C4EFA39AF7BC@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1OBArD-0000WP-FW for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 09 May 2010 14:04:03 -0400 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=56953 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OBArC-0000Vo-Cj for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 09 May 2010 14:04:03 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OBArA-0002ra-RM for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 09 May 2010 14:04:02 -0400 Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:41933) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OBArA-0002rN-Lk for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 09 May 2010 14:04:00 -0400 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OBAr9-0006e6-2A for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 09 May 2010 20:03:59 +0200 Received: from cpc1-cmbg13-0-0-cust596.cmbg.cable.ntl.com ([86.9.122.85]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 09 May 2010 20:03:59 +0200 Received: from sdl.web by cpc1-cmbg13-0-0-cust596.cmbg.cable.ntl.com with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 09 May 2010 20:03:59 +0200 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org On 2010-05-09 16:24 +0100, Carsten Dominik wrote: > Isn't this a legitimate case for overwriting these? The outline > structure is a hierarchical structure which can be traversed in a > similar way as the parenthesis structure in Lisp code.... Emacs major > mode conventions allow overwriting general commands when this makes > sense for the mode and executed similiar functionality. Probably not C-M-f and C-M-b. I haven't seen any mode in which these keys are bound to something significantly different. If org mode decide to be more structure oriented, maybe something can be learnt from nxml-mode. I have heard good things about it though I haven't used it myself. Leo