From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Leo <sdl.web@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: org-mode on sloooow computer
Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 16:27:10 +0100
Message-ID: <m0ab669inl.fsf@cam.ac.uk>
References: <87hc0fe35v.fsf@eeepc.chemeng.ucl.ac.uk>
	<87tz4fb2rb.fsf@kamaloka.dhatu>
	<74997EBF-D0EA-49F9-BC19-36535EE6ADC9@gmail.com>
	<87eiviqud3.fsf@eeepc.chemeng.ucl.ac.uk>
	<B4F95620-AF50-4FEC-9BC8-B61CFAF275DD@gmail.com>
	<87bpqmqrg3.fsf@eeepc.chemeng.ucl.ac.uk>
	<ABBDF009-2F6C-4611-8F89-40DF7A6EF1DE@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1LxNJN-0005zW-UZ
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Apr 2009 11:27:33 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1LxNJI-0005xi-H7
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Apr 2009 11:27:32 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=60610 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LxNJI-0005xf-B6
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Apr 2009 11:27:28 -0400
Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2]:42567 helo=ciao.gmane.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
	(Exim 4.60) (envelope-from <geo-emacs-orgmode@m.gmane.org>)
	id 1LxNJH-0003yz-Ps
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Apr 2009 11:27:28 -0400
Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43)
	id 1LxNJE-0001L7-BG
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Apr 2009 15:27:24 +0000
Received: from sl392.st-edmunds.cam.ac.uk ([131.111.223.202])
	by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
	id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Fri, 24 Apr 2009 15:27:24 +0000
Received: from sdl.web by sl392.st-edmunds.cam.ac.uk with local (Gmexim 0.1
	(Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Fri, 24 Apr 2009 15:27:24 +0000
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

On 2009-04-24 12:35 +0100, Carsten Dominik wrote:
> With some more improvements (available now) this should get down to
> 1.5 seconds. Not perfect, but almost a factor of three from the
> original 4.35 seconds.

I have to ditch org 6.21b now for the performance gained.

What's really annoying is that I can on longer use the following to
compile .el files. I am using GNU Emacs 23.0.92.1
(i386-apple-darwin9.6.0, NS apple-appkit-949.43) of 2009-04-22 on
neutron.local.

,----[ .bash_profile ]
| alias bbc='/Applications/Emacs.app/Contents/MacOS/Emacs -batch -q -no-site-file -f byte-compile-file'
`----

Any one got a fix?

When I run 'bbc somefile.el', it does not take the file I supply and
still ask me 'Byte compile file: '.

> Please, everybody watch out for strange behavior in the agenda, to
> make sure I have not messed up anything while doing the optimization.
>
> We should to profiling more often, this can apparently make a big
> difference.....

-- 
.: Leo :. [ sdl.web AT gmail.com ] .: I use Emacs :.