From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Leo <sdl.web@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Is this a bug in orgstruct-mode
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 11:02:39 +0100
Message-ID: <m08whgm88w.fsf@cam.ac.uk>
References: <m0eirc10om.fsf@cam.ac.uk> <m0ws51m2zn.fsf@cam.ac.uk>
	<F7292DA4-8089-4675-9417-E4296F034646@gmail.com>
	<m0skfon5kr.fsf@cam.ac.uk>
	<DBE639E3-4BC7-4488-BE45-C440307F7C50@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Mdi0I-0007gs-B1
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Aug 2009 06:02:50 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Mdi0D-0007Tf-Bn
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Aug 2009 06:02:49 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=34660 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Mdi0D-0007T6-3h
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Aug 2009 06:02:45 -0400
Received: from ppsw-7.csi.cam.ac.uk ([131.111.8.137]:36952)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <sl392@hermes.cam.ac.uk>) id 1Mdi0B-0005ow-V0
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Aug 2009 06:02:44 -0400
In-Reply-To: <DBE639E3-4BC7-4488-BE45-C440307F7C50@gmail.com> (Carsten
	Dominik's message of "Wed, 19 Aug 2009 10:31:53 +0100")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Carsten Dominik <carsten.dominik@gmail.com>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

On 2009-08-19 10:31 +0100, Carsten Dominik wrote:
>> The bug I am reporting is that when there is a blank line preceding
>> the FIRST heading or list item, the second one will have a blank
>> line. The FAQ seems to address when there is a blank line preceding
>> the second heading or list item, the third one will have a blank
>> line. The behaviour in the FAQ is smart and desirable.
>>
>> In my view the blank line preceding the FIRST heading or list item is
>> not part of that heading or list item and base behaviour on that is
>> wrong.
>
> I don't think it is either wrong or right. When creating the second
> headline, Org has no way of guessing what you want, to it makes a
> choice, and I opted for a simple algorithm that looks only above the
> previous sibling, in this case the first list item.
>
> I don't see why the other choice would be any better. Anyone else want
> to weigh in on tis issue?

I think it is completely fine to leave it as it is.

-- 
Emacs uptime: 1 day, 19 hours, 42 minutes, 30 seconds