From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Adam Porter Subject: =?UTF-8?B?UmU6IFtPVF0gQSBuZXcgd2ViIGJyb3dzZXLigL0=?= Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2016 22:00:41 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <87potzvlp0.fsf@mbork.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55442) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aoeST-0002KQ-EM for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Apr 2016 18:00:54 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aoeSQ-0006NH-7b for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Apr 2016 18:00:53 -0400 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:37753) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aoeSQ-0006N9-0x for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Apr 2016 18:00:50 -0400 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aoeSN-0001r1-KL for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Apr 2016 00:00:47 +0200 Received: from 172-0-42-27.lightspeed.ltrkar.sbcglobal.net ([172.0.42.27]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 09 Apr 2016 00:00:47 +0200 Received: from adam by 172-0-42-27.lightspeed.ltrkar.sbcglobal.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 09 Apr 2016 00:00:47 +0200 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Marcin Borkowski mbork.pl> writes: > https://vivaldi.com/ > > Did anyone hear about it? Any thoughts/experiences? "Taking notes > while browsing" seems to be something close to org-capture, no? > Keyboard-driven might mean either vim-like or emacs-like bindings, or > (hopefully) configurable ones. I, for one, would like to try it out, > though I do not have too high hopes. It looks interesting, but it's not free software, so I have no interest myself. Firefox/Iceweasel has been serving me well since before it was Firefox, and Pentadactyl has been my primary UI to it for a long time. I don't feel like Mozilla is taking it in a good direction anymore, but if it ever gets too bad, there's Iceweasel, and there's Pale Moon (which has committed to "classic" Firefox extension APIs and UI), and there are other alternatives like Conkeror, uzbl, etc. Even if you don't care about free software, Vivaldi is made by former Opera devs, so how do we know they aren't just repeating a cycle? It could go the same direction Opera went and need to be rebooted again. As long as it's proprietary, that's a risk its users will always face. My two cents. :)