From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Daniel Szmulewicz Subject: Re: ob-clojure.el (org-babel for Clojure) Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2014 14:30:30 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <87tx3mddr0.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36289) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XZhTN-0000Tl-IO for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Oct 2014 10:35:20 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XZhTF-0004sf-Dr for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Oct 2014 10:35:13 -0400 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:47558) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XZhTF-0004rs-7y for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Oct 2014 10:35:05 -0400 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XZhTE-0002Pm-CQ for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Oct 2014 16:35:04 +0200 Received: from 213.57.118.74 ([213.57.118.74]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 02 Oct 2014 16:35:04 +0200 Received: from daniel.szmulewicz by 213.57.118.74 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 02 Oct 2014 16:35:04 +0200 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Thorsten Jolitz gmail.com> writes: > Did you try other :results types like > > ,---- > | #+BEGIN_SRC clojure :results raw > `---- > Yes, thank you. I tried various switches for the results argument, and the result was the same: "Code block produced no output". I also wanted to rule out a version mismatch, so I tried in org-mode from the main branch, and the result was the same: "Code block produced no output". Things are moving fast with Cider, maybe an API that ob-clojure.el was relying upon underwent a breaking change?.