From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Aviv Subject: Using a simpler link syntax in org-mode? Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 02:28:11 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41949) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WDVMZ-0003SU-Uv for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Feb 2014 03:40:16 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WDVMV-0004fO-4O for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Feb 2014 03:40:11 -0500 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:54824) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WDVMU-0004eo-UN for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Feb 2014 03:40:07 -0500 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WDVMR-0002o9-8D for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Feb 2014 09:40:03 +0100 Received: from c-67-188-107-222.hsd1.ca.comcast.net ([67.188.107.222]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 12 Feb 2014 09:40:03 +0100 Received: from orgmodegmaneFeb14.z.m1 by c-67-188-107-222.hsd1.ca.comcast.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 12 Feb 2014 09:40:03 +0100 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org I'd like to have links with the syntax [[foo bar]] go to files with the name foo bar.org. This would make using org-mode much more like using a personal local wiki. Is this possible without breaking existing link functionality? I'd also ideally still be able to export to html, etc. with standard org-mode tools. The best I've been able to do is something like: (setq org-link-abbrev-alist '(("o" . "file:%s.org"))) This lets me use the syntax [[o:foo bar]], but that is more verbose, and looks distractingly ugly inline. For example: The quick brown o:fox jumps over the o:lazy_dog. And `[[o:foo bar][foo bar]]` is even more verbose to type and edit (though it reads fine in org modde). FYI, I was asked to crosspost this from stackoverflow at http://stackoverflow.com/q/21085720/1137803 (I waited several weeks with no answer; I hope that is appropriate) Regards - Aviv