From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Brady Trainor Subject: Re: hyperlink to customize Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2013 05:57:48 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <87r49lloaa.fsf@alphaville.bos.redhat.com> <87mwk9llw7.fsf@alphaville.bos.redhat.com> <87iouwlnmj.fsf@alphaville.bos.redhat.com> <87txegjqq2.fsf@alphaville.bos.redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51731) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VqcoO-0005Us-7G for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Dec 2013 00:58:27 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VqcoG-0008FY-Q3 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Dec 2013 00:58:20 -0500 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:54643) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VqcoG-0008Eg-BT for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Dec 2013 00:58:12 -0500 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VqcoD-0000EB-SO for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Dec 2013 06:58:10 +0100 Received: from 71-217-31-190.tukw.qwest.net ([71.217.31.190]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 11 Dec 2013 06:58:09 +0100 Received: from algebrat by 71-217-31-190.tukw.qwest.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 11 Dec 2013 06:58:09 +0100 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Nick Dokos gmail.com> writes: > Yes, you will be happiest when you are assimilated :borg: > > Would be nice to have org versions of all info files. > > [...] why do you > want to have org versions of all info files? What would the benefits > be? > > [...] But rewriting > existing texinfo documentation in org just does not seem to > provide many (or even any) benefits. (disclaimer: my naïve impression) - clarifications - maybe not /all/ info files should be converted - elisp and maybe the main Emacs manuals may be considered more pivotal to all users and all modes - maybe only a conversion to outline mode? - I don't know if that has the potential for hyperlinks, but may supply all the info functionality; is outline mode "lighter"? - drawbacks - slow (large elisp info file in org) - hard to convert info to org? - positives - another way to look at the info (like a change of coordinates ;) ) - org's outline mode supplies one less step between browsing the section titles and reading the content in unfolding, easier to navigate especially, there is the effect that it may be hard to know where to look for a possible elisp command, and so the more aids in browsing for that command, the better.