From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Achim Gratz Subject: Re: org-agenda-write taking very long (probably because of babel) Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2013 10:51:51 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <2013-02-27T17-53-25@devnull.Karl-Voit.at> <87y5e9icwc.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <87bob4g6ju.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:38687) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UB15z-0006Dq-Lm for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Feb 2013 05:52:16 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UB15y-0001P2-9L for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Feb 2013 05:52:15 -0500 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:38389) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UB15y-0001Ot-2p for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Feb 2013 05:52:14 -0500 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UB16D-0004zX-G0 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Feb 2013 11:52:29 +0100 Received: from 217.10.52.10 ([217.10.52.10]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 28 Feb 2013 11:52:29 +0100 Received: from Stromeko by 217.10.52.10 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 28 Feb 2013 11:52:29 +0100 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Bastien altern.org> writes: > Sorry to nitpick on this but please keep the Emacs-like change log > small, if not terse. I've thought about this, but then decided that the change does some seemingly superfluous things and I'd better explain why they are necessary. > Additionnal details are more than welcome in > the commit message though. So I'll cut the changelog after the first sentence and relegate the rest of the explanation to the commit message (if the patch works, of course) -- OK? Regards, Achim.