From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Achim Gratz Subject: Re: compilation issues of new export framework Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2013 07:49:12 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <876229nrxf.fsf@gmail.com> <87a9rd3odf.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <87y5ex5rwa.fsf_-_@Rainer.invalid> <877gmhs7f4.fsf@gmail.com> <87txpko3cr.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <87k3qgfhz4.fsf@gmail.com> <87fw14f9m0.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:55584) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U4o8r-00009X-Gf for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Feb 2013 02:49:34 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U4o8q-0005R4-Fn for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Feb 2013 02:49:33 -0500 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:40944) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U4o8q-0005Qt-03 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Feb 2013 02:49:32 -0500 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1U4o95-0006Iq-Qc for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Feb 2013 08:49:47 +0100 Received: from 217.10.52.10 ([217.10.52.10]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 11 Feb 2013 08:49:47 +0100 Received: from Stromeko by 217.10.52.10 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 11 Feb 2013 08:49:47 +0100 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Nicolas Goaziou gmail.com> writes: > On the other hand, `org-element-type' and al. from org.el are called > less often. So, it is not a problem if they are compiled as function > calls. They are normally not compiled as function calls, only in single mode. Regarding commit 6b7101b91, did you intend to demote org-element-nested-p to a defun or was this just a leftover from the earlier experiment? Regards, Achim